Wednesday, October 19, 2011

New Fees for Inland Water Way Being Considered


As reported by Professional Mariner, Congress recently began considering an Inland Waterways Development Plan to improve the United States inland waterways transportation system and infrastructure over the next 20 years.

Agreed, the inland waterway system is in need of some major maintenance and upgrades, however the idea of another tax submitted under the radar of most media is a bit unsettling. The most troubling aspect, is that there have been numerous expenditures by the Federal Government earmarked for the "Nation's Infrastructure" that have funded projects such as wildlife repopulating, tunnels for turtles, beach erosion repair and countless others. The term "Shovel-ready" has been used a lot in the interest of political posturing with regards to the current unemployment situation.

I get the feeling that a six to nine cent increase per gallon of diesel assessed on commercial carriers may not seem like a big deal to a lot of people. I suggest we dissect what is happening here. First for every 1000 gallons of fuel sold to commercial carriers as a "user fee," this means a 90 dollar fee (tax). Commercial carriers use 10's of thousands of gallons of fuel per month. Next, they (the Government) is redefining the scope of what constitutes U.S. Waterways, more than doubling the covered area to include the Intercoastal Waterways (ICW). What's the big deal? The ICW commercial operators will now be assessed this fee, which means no matter the size of your boat, if you use it commercially you will pay this additional money.


The most important thing to remember about these fees charged to the commercial carriers are passed down to the end consumer. Costs of goods that are transported on the inland waterways as well as the intercoastal waterways will go up. Who's paying for the upgrades, not the commercial carrier, but the every American who struggles to pay for the goods they already buy.

I will end this by comparing this whole situation to the revision of banking regulations Early on, many critics said there would be unintended consequences. Two years later, everyone is up in arms about the fact banks are charging customers to use debit cards. (Most notably Bank of America.) I don't blame the banks, they are a business and are simply passing on the cost of operations to the consumers. Long story short, if you spend money on any product or service you will be contributing to this increased user fee for inland waterways and the expansion to cover the ICW.

K. Swanson

Monday, October 17, 2011

Seattle Spill Seems Under Control


It is truly good news that the work crews have recovered the 75 foot boat that sank in west Seattle on Friday. Better news is that the environmental impact seems to be relatively small. While the crews were unable to completely recover the diesel fuel and other petroleum products released into the Puget Sound, at least one local news station reported that the oil sheen could not be seen at all in a "fly-over."

This is where it will get interesting. This is a very small (relatively speaking) accident. It has been reported that the company who operated the vessel will be receiving the bill for the clean-up. This is probably the best course of action. The question comes as to who will be "blamed" for the accident. W

We, the American people have a need to assign blame and then move on from there. Yes, its a tragedy - someone must be at fault - we have a name - OK now on to the next media generated crisis.


This article is about the small Seattle boat Sinking, why the big emphasis on blame? A little over a year ago, the Deepwater Horizon blew up, sank, and spilled hundreds of thousand of gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico. Who did we blame? That was easy, British Petroleum. Their name was on the rig, they started nobly paying the bill - problem solved. A year later, how many people know that several other contractors have been implicated in the spill. How many people that you know can name any of those other companies? Transocean; have you heard of them? Haliburton; did you know they have been cited? Most people would say no, it was all BP's fault.

Everyone who reads this might be asking if I'm ever going to get to a point. Yes, here it is - If your to quick to assign blame, your going to inevitably let someone who is guilty off the hook.

This is just a little food for thought.

Karl Swanson
Managing Member
Mystery Bay Marine, LLC